The moderator is basically the equivalent of the environmental evaluator in a genetic/survival of the fittest algorithm. So of course the moderator will shape the outcome. No surprise there.
It’s more of a god role where sudden changes are possible to the environment that no fitness level could prepare for (e.g. a mod can decide to change history after it happened, or remove entire scenes suddenly), those violate the natural order of things to which you allude
Reddit is the cancer of the internet
It's just the most obvious tumor. The cancer is present everywhere that people's rightthink score is meticulously kept.
The moderator is basically the equivalent of the environmental evaluator in a genetic/survival of the fittest algorithm. So of course the moderator will shape the outcome. No surprise there.
It’s more of a god role where sudden changes are possible to the environment that no fitness level could prepare for (e.g. a mod can decide to change history after it happened, or remove entire scenes suddenly), those violate the natural order of things to which you allude
It’s the opposite. Moderator is arbitrary authority to do as they please.
Survival of fittest would be if opinions were allowed, and let the best one win.
/r/Italy is the perfect example for this study
In a related research paper, scientists proved that water is wet.
I wonder how these kinds of papers get funding at all…