> Musk... had explored creating a for-profit arm of OpenAI where he would hold the majority of the equity and control the company. When those plans fell apart, he stopped making regular donations to OpenAI
I see, so Elon is mad that someone other than him looted OpenAI, not that it got looted at all. Not that I expected any different from this guy, but having to admit that in court isn't going to help his case.
Is it possible for both sides of a lawsuit like this to lose more than lawyer fees? If so, that's the outcome I'm rooting for.
> Elon Musk came to a California federal court on Wednesday to argue that Sam Altman and his co-founders “stole a charity.” He left having admitted, under oath, that Tesla is not currently pursuing artificial general intelligence (AGI)— directly contradicting a tweet he’d posted just weeks earlier.
Ketamine, sleep deprivation, and tweeting aren't a good legal strategy?
[dead]
https://archive.is/2026.04.30-011837/https://techcrunch.com/...
> Musk... had explored creating a for-profit arm of OpenAI where he would hold the majority of the equity and control the company. When those plans fell apart, he stopped making regular donations to OpenAI
I see, so Elon is mad that someone other than him looted OpenAI, not that it got looted at all. Not that I expected any different from this guy, but having to admit that in court isn't going to help his case.
Is it possible for both sides of a lawsuit like this to lose more than lawyer fees? If so, that's the outcome I'm rooting for.
> Elon Musk came to a California federal court on Wednesday to argue that Sam Altman and his co-founders “stole a charity.” He left having admitted, under oath, that Tesla is not currently pursuing artificial general intelligence (AGI)— directly contradicting a tweet he’d posted just weeks earlier.
AGIYAGNI under oath