Weird post. It starts by lambasting someone for being wrong despite being an expert¹, then immediately reveals they were a journalist (not necessarily an expert on the subject matter), then goes on about them for a bit before changing gears to a different subject which has nothing to do with the person in the title.
¹ Which is silly on its own. An expert is someone who has more knowledge on a particular subject than most other people. It doesn’t mean they’re always right, it just means they are more informed about whatever they’re saying. Still, this is a common tactic to discredit whoever one disagrees with, since you can found at least one expert that was wrong for just about anything.
Weird post. It starts by lambasting someone for being wrong despite being an expert¹, then immediately reveals they were a journalist (not necessarily an expert on the subject matter), then goes on about them for a bit before changing gears to a different subject which has nothing to do with the person in the title.
¹ Which is silly on its own. An expert is someone who has more knowledge on a particular subject than most other people. It doesn’t mean they’re always right, it just means they are more informed about whatever they’re saying. Still, this is a common tactic to discredit whoever one disagrees with, since you can found at least one expert that was wrong for just about anything.