> What we see is not what was there. What we see is what happened to escape decay.
And we have been extraordinary lucky in what had survived. Also think ancient species.
One question is whether what has survived is statistically representative OR whether there are significant historical evidence completely outside the realm of what has survived…
> What we see is not what was there. What we see is what happened to escape decay.
And we have been extraordinary lucky in what had survived. Also think ancient species.
One question is whether what has survived is statistically representative OR whether there are significant historical evidence completely outside the realm of what has survived…
Thank you. I thought I was the only one thinking like that :)