seeing that Panda-70M research paper linked above makes this even crazier. the 'good faith' part of DMCA is basically never enforced in reality. platforms have used the 'shoot first, ask questions later' approach for so long that individual creators are just collateral damage. its about time someone actually challenged this in court. the power imbalance here is just wild tbh.
> Apple's research papers indicate that some of the YouTube videos uploaded by the plaintiffs were used to train its AI models, the complaint alleges.
Wonder which research papers.
You can read the complaint (linked in the article) https://www.scribd.com/document/1022659389/Ted-Entertainment...
> Panda-70M
https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/conditioned-video...
seeing that Panda-70M research paper linked above makes this even crazier. the 'good faith' part of DMCA is basically never enforced in reality. platforms have used the 'shoot first, ask questions later' approach for so long that individual creators are just collateral damage. its about time someone actually challenged this in court. the power imbalance here is just wild tbh.
Hasn't it already been decided that training on copyright material is fair use?