Can’t this be circumvented by not doing the same thing for the new employer? I imagine in some cases companies are willing to hire someone just to stop them from doing what they’re doing.
It could be a win-win for everyone and they inform him they will not enforce any non-competes.
“After spending (…) then a little less than two years at Intel Foundry, O'Buckley will now supervise how Qualcomm turns its designs into finished silicon.
Whether or not Intel Foundry will produce any of Qualcomm's future designs is something that remains to be seen.”
In terms of R&D - as ARM - or Qualcomm indexes, which exit as capitol accumulates prior to leveraging microprocessors in "X" as contract appropriation.
Doesn’t this breach non compete agreements which probably Intel had them sign? Or are they really not enforceable?
Can’t this be circumvented by not doing the same thing for the new employer? I imagine in some cases companies are willing to hire someone just to stop them from doing what they’re doing.
It could be a win-win for everyone and they inform him they will not enforce any non-competes.
“After spending (…) then a little less than two years at Intel Foundry, O'Buckley will now supervise how Qualcomm turns its designs into finished silicon.
Whether or not Intel Foundry will produce any of Qualcomm's future designs is something that remains to be seen.”
RAT DISTORTION PEDAL: WITH 3 Valves:
Distortion
Filter
Volume
The circuitires of distortion. Guess it is a matter of aesthetics.
In terms of R&D - as ARM - or Qualcomm indexes, which exit as capitol accumulates prior to leveraging microprocessors in "X" as contract appropriation.