3 points | by hollowsolve 5 hours ago ago
6 comments
How about performance?
Performance breakdown: https://matchlang.com/docs/api/benchmarks
You didn't understand the query
How does yours compare to regexp on performance across many inputs?
Regexp is incredibly fast, I doubt yours comes anywhere close
and then there's the kicker, Ai are really good at crafting regexp, better than writing code to replace it, that's for sure
---
looks like the comment I am replying to has changed the link, it was this one: https://matchlang.com/docs/api/performance
Note to OP, use standard regexp benchmarks
elaborate?
Look at a fast regex library [1] and take a subset of those tests or benchmarks and apply to match.
[1] https://github.com/intel/hyperscan/tree/master
That could be a fun comparison. As someone mentioned, regular expressions are extremely fast, and have been benchmarked forever.
[dead]
How about performance?
Performance breakdown: https://matchlang.com/docs/api/benchmarks
You didn't understand the query
How does yours compare to regexp on performance across many inputs?
Regexp is incredibly fast, I doubt yours comes anywhere close
and then there's the kicker, Ai are really good at crafting regexp, better than writing code to replace it, that's for sure
---
looks like the comment I am replying to has changed the link, it was this one: https://matchlang.com/docs/api/performance
Note to OP, use standard regexp benchmarks
elaborate?
Look at a fast regex library [1] and take a subset of those tests or benchmarks and apply to match.
[1] https://github.com/intel/hyperscan/tree/master
That could be a fun comparison. As someone mentioned, regular expressions are extremely fast, and have been benchmarked forever.
[dead]