Update: sounds like the author had some life changes and had to stop his YouTube channel which was the primary motivator for the library- but there are forks popping up (https://github.com/canvas-commons/canvas-commons).
---
This notion that an open source library is "dead" and shouldn't be used because it's not being actively updated is a bit odd. You can fork and fix issues you have. It's got years of many people's work put into it. It's a great library and widely used on YouTube and elsewhere.
The entire Manim CE Logo example, the `x - x_1` text from the Brace Annotation example, all text from the Sin Cos Plot example, and the entire Heat Diagram example all flicker roughly once per second.
The text looks rather fuzzy, especially the large M from the Manim CE Logo example.
The Three D Light Source example also doesn't appear to have any functioning directional lighting.
I think there is some value in asking these questions. Maybe a better question would be how much effort and time was put into a project.
1. Maintenance: Projects that (seem to) have the same quality and complexity but were built over months or years by hand versus built with an AI tool in a weekend will probably experience different amounts of maintenance in the future. This is, of course, not a black-and-white rule. But simply knowing that people think a project is worth spending months or years on gives me an indication that they probably want to keep it alive in the future.
2. Testing: Projects developed by hand probably underwent a lot more hidden manual testing—maybe on different hardware, maybe by more than one person. Since my personal projects have gotten significantly more complex with the availability of AI coding assistance, I spend much more time writing prompts and thinking about integration testing. But this is not the case for all projects.
You mention using MathJax for LaTeX rendering, which is great for web compatibility. Have you explored the potential limitations of rendering text due to the lack of Pango? This might affect clarity in complex equations. Also, any thoughts on how it performs with large animations compared to traditional Manim: does the browser handle it smoothly?
This is great timing — I've been putting off making animated diagrams for a blog post because the Manim setup was too much friction for what I needed.
Tried the live demo and the 3D orbit scene is surprisingly smooth. Curious about a couple things:
- How are you handling the animation interpolation? Manim's rate functions (smooth, there_and_back, etc.) have some quirks that are easy to get subtly wrong. Did you reimplement those from scratch or find a way to match the Python easing curves exactly?
- For the py2ts converter — how far does it get on real-world scripts? I have a few older Manim CE scripts with custom VMobjects and I'm wondering if it handles subclassing or if it's more of a "simple scenes only" thing.
One suggestion: it'd be really useful to have an export-to-GIF or export-to-MP4 option directly in the browser (maybe via MediaRecorder API). A lot of the Manim use case is generating assets for slides/posts, not just live playback.
Looks great! Just started exploring the docs, the links under each example with heading "Learn More" are not clickable. Congrats on the launch, I'll enjoy learning more about it.
However, I use Manim for maths, for me having computational libraries (python) is a requirement. Most of the transformations that I do are found by using linear algebra, calculus and sometimes full neural networks. All my geometry is computed, not placed by hand.
I'm wondering if it would not be possible to have a 'canvas' backend for the web in the python version instead.
Btw, Manim is kind of easy to install in its own docker ;)
Motion Canvas is a mature / popular solution in the "manim but typescript" space for those unfamiliar.
It can be used for interactive blog posts and embedded animations etc as well.
It also has a built in animation editor / timeline.
https://github.com/motion-canvas/motion-canvas
Please note that Motion Canvas is also abandoned, the main site is down, and the last commit was Dec 2024.
Afaik it's considered "stable".
There's 2800+ people in the discord.
And the community made a backup of the site https://archive.canvascommons.io/
Update: sounds like the author had some life changes and had to stop his YouTube channel which was the primary motivator for the library- but there are forks popping up (https://github.com/canvas-commons/canvas-commons).
---
This notion that an open source library is "dead" and shouldn't be used because it's not being actively updated is a bit odd. You can fork and fix issues you have. It's got years of many people's work put into it. It's a great library and widely used on YouTube and elsewhere.
Canvas Commons is an active fork of the original repo: https://github.com/canvas-commons/canvas-commons Docs for Canvas Commons: https://canvascommons.io/
Furthermore, the old docs for Motion Canvas can be found here: https://archive.canvascommons.io/
How easy is it to replicate manim's style using motion canvas?
Someone wrote a blog about their journey https://slama.dev/motion-canvas/introduction/
But- probably reasonably simple, if you mean the "writing" style of manim. That's just animating an SVG stroke.
And then colors and typography
Bug reports:
The entire Manim CE Logo example, the `x - x_1` text from the Brace Annotation example, all text from the Sin Cos Plot example, and the entire Heat Diagram example all flicker roughly once per second.
The text looks rather fuzzy, especially the large M from the Manim CE Logo example.
The Three D Light Source example also doesn't appear to have any functioning directional lighting.
Thanks for the feedback! I’ve created issues based on your description and will fix them soon
- https://github.com/maloyan/manim-web/issues/44 - https://github.com/maloyan/manim-web/issues/45 - https://github.com/maloyan/manim-web/issues/46
Issues were all marked as fixed, but the first two still persist.
The flickering in particular was fixed only on the logo example, but now exists on the Three D Light Source Position example as well.
For issues, may I recommend a more "human-in-the-loop" approach?
Same, on Safari
How much of the work here was done by an agent?
(Being AI accelerated doesn't make this project low value. But it does mean _you_ didn't do the port so much as prompt it)
100% was generated by the agent. It was part of my experiment in Zencoder
You're going to be asking this same question a lot going into the future.
Perhaps that means it's not a question worth asking?
I think there is some value in asking these questions. Maybe a better question would be how much effort and time was put into a project.
1. Maintenance: Projects that (seem to) have the same quality and complexity but were built over months or years by hand versus built with an AI tool in a weekend will probably experience different amounts of maintenance in the future. This is, of course, not a black-and-white rule. But simply knowing that people think a project is worth spending months or years on gives me an indication that they probably want to keep it alive in the future.
2. Testing: Projects developed by hand probably underwent a lot more hidden manual testing—maybe on different hardware, maybe by more than one person. Since my personal projects have gotten significantly more complex with the availability of AI coding assistance, I spend much more time writing prompts and thinking about integration testing. But this is not the case for all projects.
Can I get your socials? (X/Linkedin) I have created something and you might find it useful
You mention using MathJax for LaTeX rendering, which is great for web compatibility. Have you explored the potential limitations of rendering text due to the lack of Pango? This might affect clarity in complex equations. Also, any thoughts on how it performs with large animations compared to traditional Manim: does the browser handle it smoothly?
This is great timing — I've been putting off making animated diagrams for a blog post because the Manim setup was too much friction for what I needed.
Tried the live demo and the 3D orbit scene is surprisingly smooth. Curious about a couple things:
- How are you handling the animation interpolation? Manim's rate functions (smooth, there_and_back, etc.) have some quirks that are easy to get subtly wrong. Did you reimplement those from scratch or find a way to match the Python easing curves exactly? - For the py2ts converter — how far does it get on real-world scripts? I have a few older Manim CE scripts with custom VMobjects and I'm wondering if it handles subclassing or if it's more of a "simple scenes only" thing.
One suggestion: it'd be really useful to have an export-to-GIF or export-to-MP4 option directly in the browser (maybe via MediaRecorder API). A lot of the Manim use case is generating assets for slides/posts, not just live playback.
Looks great! Just started exploring the docs, the links under each example with heading "Learn More" are not clickable. Congrats on the launch, I'll enjoy learning more about it.
Very nice project, I see many use cases.
However, I use Manim for maths, for me having computational libraries (python) is a requirement. Most of the transformations that I do are found by using linear algebra, calculus and sometimes full neural networks. All my geometry is computed, not placed by hand.
I'm wondering if it would not be possible to have a 'canvas' backend for the web in the python version instead.
Btw, Manim is kind of easy to install in its own docker ;)
Thank you! I regularly use Reveal.js to create interactive slide decks for my classes, and your project will be a great tool to have!
Amazing!! This is a project I've wanted to tackle for years but never got the chance to properly do.
This is fantastic! Thank you for sharing.
thank you! this is awesome!!!
I'm far more into the web than python and have wanted something I could drop into a web page.
Congrats! This looks awesome!
Now someone’s going to write a react-manim renderer I’m sure.