Uh... good? He used his money and influence for an attempted coup and then an attack on the capitol building that resulted in multiple deaths and hundreds of convictions for things like sedition.
If a private business can't choose to stop aiding literal treason, none of us have any freedom of association at all.
Yet he was never charged or convicted of any crimes related to the supposed insurrection. So, you want banks to be able to decide to debank anyone, even without their day in court? So much for the presumption of innocence?
He urged people to protest peacefully. The clips that lots of the news outlets used was chopped up and made to specifically sound incendiary even though that's not what it said... so, they broke the law while doing that.
So, hate the man all you want but it is clear that the entire system broke laws, bent laws, even changed laws just to go after him.
NY passing a law that allowed sexual harassment cases that had passed the statue of limitations to be valid is another example. Let's make these old cases allowed, charge Trump, then they reversed that opening after he was charged. That's lawfare. They just wanted to get Trump no matter what.
Republicans have been the ones arguing that businesses don't have to do business with anyone for any reason. Are you saying they don't believe that standard should apply to Trump? If so, that sounds like hypocrisy to me.
I think this is an OK standard for small privately owned businesses... like a bakery, a mechanics shop, etc. Obviously the rules would be different for services that are required and necessary. Ie. a telephone company, national ISP's, hospitals, banks, etc. Especially banks that received government bail-out funds. So, it's different to me.
Uh... good? He used his money and influence for an attempted coup and then an attack on the capitol building that resulted in multiple deaths and hundreds of convictions for things like sedition.
If a private business can't choose to stop aiding literal treason, none of us have any freedom of association at all.
Yet he was never charged or convicted of any crimes related to the supposed insurrection. So, you want banks to be able to decide to debank anyone, even without their day in court? So much for the presumption of innocence?
He urged people to protest peacefully. The clips that lots of the news outlets used was chopped up and made to specifically sound incendiary even though that's not what it said... so, they broke the law while doing that.
So, hate the man all you want but it is clear that the entire system broke laws, bent laws, even changed laws just to go after him.
NY passing a law that allowed sexual harassment cases that had passed the statue of limitations to be valid is another example. Let's make these old cases allowed, charge Trump, then they reversed that opening after he was charged. That's lawfare. They just wanted to get Trump no matter what.
Republicans have been the ones arguing that businesses don't have to do business with anyone for any reason. Are you saying they don't believe that standard should apply to Trump? If so, that sounds like hypocrisy to me.
I think this is an OK standard for small privately owned businesses... like a bakery, a mechanics shop, etc. Obviously the rules would be different for services that are required and necessary. Ie. a telephone company, national ISP's, hospitals, banks, etc. Especially banks that received government bail-out funds. So, it's different to me.
“Sorry sir- I know you’re having a heart attack but you really should find a doctor that treats $POLITICAL_PARTY.”
Sounds familiar.
"Sorry maam, I know you're miscarrying, but you should really find a pharmacist that fills prescriptions for reproductive issues."
There are thousands of banks in this country. They take money from the most despicable people. Trump was never in danger of being unbanked.